Maryland Rejects Banning of Dogs in Pickups

Daphne Reid
by Daphne Reid
View Biography
 

Annapolis, Maryland (Feb 19th, 2009)

The Maryland Senate has rejected a bill that would have required pet owners to harness or cage their pets when carrying them in the back of open trucks.

Maryland Rejects Banning of Dogs in Pickups

Despite the bill passing through the House almost unanimously last year, the Senate voted against the bill by 30-17 against. Maryland therefore continues to be one of the 25 states with no regulations regarding the transport of pets in cars and trucks, although no state currently has the level of regulation that the bill proposed. Anyone violating the new law would have faced a fine of up to $500 but no points against a driver's license. The bill was introduced by Senator Norman Stone Jr. in the Senate and Delegate Kevin Kelly in the House. Kelly introduced the bill after personal experience of swerving to avoid a dog that leapt from a pick-up truck traveling alongside him.

In California, the law requires anyone carrying an animal in the back of a truck to have side and trail racks, or to tether the animal. Interestingly, however, the law specifically excludes "the transportation of a dog whose owner either owns or is employed by a ranching or farming operation who is traveling on a road in a rural area or who is traveling to and from a livestock auction."

One of the most vocal supporters of the bill was the Humane Society of the United States, who said in a statement, "If your truck hits a bump, or if you step on the brakes suddenly or swerve to avoid an obstacle, your dog can easily be thrown from the truck bed and onto the road. Chances are, this will injure or kill your dog. But even if it doesn't, being struck by another vehicle probably will. Also, other drivers may cause an accident by swerving to avoid hitting your dog."

This news story is independently sourced and PetPeoplesPlace.com does not specifically endorse products or services offered by any company referenced in this article, or benefit from any association with any companies referenced.

This news story is available to members for reprint - Reprint This Article.
Add Your Comment
Readers' Comments (Newest to Oldest)
California
dogtraining
Message Me!
Add to Friends
Junior Member
Added on Feb 21st, 2009
I live in a rural part of California and board a horse at a local ranch. It is very sad to see how many dogs travel in the back of pickups. In the past I have told owners how unsafe it is for their dogs and they think I'm being silly. The dogs have no idea that their lives are at risk and often look like they're enjoying it which I think the owners use as an argument in favor of the practice. I have also noticed that the dogs are left with no water and in inclimate weather with no protection. When will people start putting their dogs safety and well being ahead of their own and stop making excuses? Everyone knows that a dog can be thrown or jump out of the back of a pickup. These same people will often take their dogs out in areas with traffic off leash. What happens when they see another dog and get excited or aggressive? I saw a dog run across the street to greet another dog and get hit by a car going very fast. All of this is just irresponsible ownership, supposedly we love our animals, when will people start acting like it?
   
Yours Truly,
   
Teri Brown
Canada
Julie244
Message Me!
Add to Friends
Junior Member
Added on Feb 20th, 2009
When I was growing up wer had a Golden Retriever who used to ride in the back of the pick-up truck we had and he jumped out one and was lost for three days and he had broken his hip. This caused him to have severe arthritis in his hip when he got older. It was very sad. I don't recommend this practise of letting the dogs ride in the back of the truck!
   
Julia